Now That Was a Tough Election

Here it is upon us again: the election season. Crazy things happen during an election. One hears of candidates being "attacked," possibly "repeatedly attacked," by letters to the editor or in posted comments. Signs are down or missing, so it must be another candidate doing it (and not the wind or kids or someone trying to see around a corner). 

With all this angst, it is important to remember it is about Granville first. It is not about any candidates. It is not about getting elected. It is about Granville.

Actually, so far this year the letters and comments are pretty mild. Questions are being raised about policy issues and potential conflicts of interest. It’s pretty fair to ask about policies a candidate will pursue and whether or not the candidate will exercise independent judgement when elected. 

To help put it all in perspective, let me tell you about an election not so long ago. A number of us, myself included, were running for Village Council. Shortly before election day, information based on a forged document and very derogatory to two Village Council candidates was placed in a newspaper. The forged document was planted with a reporter for the Sentinel by someone who turned out to be involved with a competing candidate’s campaign. It was given to the reporter under the proviso that the identity of the individual planting the information would remain unknown. The paper went ahead and printed the story. As one of the candidates negatively impacted by the forged document my initial reaction was strong. How dare someone attack us using a forged document? It is outrageous that someone can do this anonymously. All the two of us could do is deny that the document was real. It just was not how life should be.

And of course it was, and is, not how life should be. But life in politics is not ordinary life. Any time you get thousands of people together there will be a few who stoop to pretty low tactics to achieve their aims. 

My advice to candidates and elected officials? I hate to use the phrase, but it applies: just get over it. Don’t get distracted. Never take it personally. And always remember after the election we all need to work together for Granville.

What happened in that Village Council election? Both of us were elected to office by an overwhelming margin. And, we did ultimately learn who planted the forged document. But it made no difference. We were over it.

 

Bill Wernet

 

Comment viewing options

Select your preferred way to display the comments and click "Save settings" to activate your changes.

personal attacks are, well ... personal

"My advice to candidates and elected officials? I hate to use the phrase, but it applies: just get over it. Don’t get distracted. Never take it personally. And always remember after the election we all need to work together for Granville."

 
Nice try Bill.
 
I applaud the sentiment and all, however, this is still politics.
It is never about Granville or any town, it is always about me. What can I get? How can I shift things to better myself? Who or what can be bought, sold, or taken?
The entire political arena is nothing more than a giant cesspool filled with the most vile, greedy, snakes alive. Nothing personal Bill. It saddens me to see just how low some people will sink for a small town Village Council or Trustee job. Shows me that there is a lot to be gained even in the game of small town government.
What are the names of the people that placed the false document?
Were thes characters prosecuted? Guess it is just politics as usuall, may the strongest snake win.
Have a nice day.
  

 

Watch out for the developer interests - they gain personally

Some people run to benefit the community. Some people run for personal gain..
I get concerned when someone runs for office who has land set for development. Or someone who is close to development interests. They always get real careful during the campaign - they try to say just the right thing. Then once they get in they try to do things like get Pataskala water and sewer in the township. Or they try to increase density of development.They try to get a bunch more houses on a small piece of land.
A lot of good people run. Safest to avoid those tied with development. 
  

how do you spell       BEN

how do you spell       BEN BARTON ?

Learning from inaccurate attacks

It is interesting how inaccurate attacks do tend to backfire.
 
That letter from the two former trustees talking about candidates "coming out of the woodwork" with no local service or experience is a great example. Contrary to what the two former trustees wrote, several non-trustee-endorsed candidates have given quite a bit of service to the community.
 
The inaccurate letter from the former trustees nicely underlines how much their favored duo of township trustee candidates is part of that trustee group.
 
I suspect the duo are nice guys and the trustee group is very comfortable with them and their ideas, but given the issues Granville now faces we need some new blood and new ideas in township trustee positions.

cronyism .....P U

i personally  think a sitting trustee or village council member
should NOT endorse another person 
it smells of cronyism
new ideas 
new people in there smells like  rose petals
we should encourage term limits 
some of these folks need to go …..
in a hurry

Some don't know any other way

I’d have to agree with you for the most part.  Sure, it would be nice if people writing letters would espouse the merits of those they back.  You’re always going to have those whose first instinct is to go negative.  Of course, as we saw this week, it’s one thing for one’s surrogates to attack the opposition, it’s quite another, however, when you’ve got one shot to reach the public and you blow it by attacking one of the other candidates and don’t embrace that opportunity by telling us why we should vote for you.  That was really sad.  But, ultimately, even though it was unintentional, it tells us everything we need to know.